LayerEdge.com
Visitor #42725

Same Sex Movement/Marriage

If you think we live in a democracy, think again. One state legislator, Pat Bauer from South Bend has prevented even a vote in the Indiana House on passing a constitutional amendment defining marriage. I believe we now live in a "judocracy" where judges are legislating from the bench even though the U.S. Constitution states that Congress shall make "all laws." We now have at least two mayors in San Francisco and in New York thumbing their noses at legislative statues and voter initiatives.

While I would vote for Bush's proposal on a federal constitutional amendment, I would prefer not to lose this chance in a lifetime to fix our government. See my statements above on activist judges.

We now have judges saying that state governments have no rational basis in promoting marriage over gay unions. African-Americans and women gained their rights through constitutional amendments and legislative enactments. The homosexual movement should follow the same course. If the constitution is interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court to not protect homosexual sodomy in 1986 in the Bowers decision but that it does in the 2003 Laurence decision, then I ask if we are not reminded of what Martin Luther said about church councils in that they had no authority for him because they contradicted one another. Justice Thomas recently wrote that the constitution should mean the same thing in 25 years as it does today. I agree.