Indianapolis Lawyer

Finding the Right Criminal Defense Lawyer to Fight Your DUI Charges

Nov 282010

If you have recently been arrested for DUI, you will be faced with many different kinds of penalties. These penalties commonly include monetary fines, suspension of your drivers license, and possibly jail time. Consequences for driving under the influence will vary from state to state, however the regulations have consistently became more strict over the past few years and will result in harsh penalties. It is possible to beat these penalties, but usually only if you have a DUI lawyer representing you.

Drunk driving cases tend not to be clear-cut in court, said a San Diego DUI lawyer. All states have a legal blood alcohol content limit, otherwise known as BAC. What most people don’t know is that you can still face charges even if your BAC is below the legal limit. For example, if you had one drink then drove home about an hour later and happened to get pulled over, you can still get into legal trouble. Even though you are no longer feeling the effects of the alcohol, because there are traces of it in your blood you can still face charges.

A highly skilled DUI lawyer will know where to find all the loopholes that can help get your charges reduced or have your case dismissed entirely. Hiring a DUI lawyer to represent you is crucial as if you are faced with all the charges you will be facing thousands of dollars in fines, long-term spikes in car insurance, and possibly the loss of your job due to jail time.

There is a lot of area for mistakes by the police officer when they pull you over for drunk driving. Firstly, they need to note whether you acted or looked intoxicated, as this allows them to begin several tests. These tests are all part of a field sobriety test, which normally does not have answers that are black and white.

A DUI San Diego attorney advised, this may seem unfair, but it is up to the police officer to decide if you are acting drunk. A biased police officer who decides he thinks you are drunk whether you are or not is a possibility. In court, it is simply your word versus his, and if you do not have a DUI lawyer your chances of winning are not good.

One of the most common issues with the system is the devices that are used. When you are given a blood or breathalyzer test to gauge your degree of intoxication, it is highly likely for the equipment results to be wrong. The problem is that most people believe that these tests are always right and always rely on what they say no matter what.

The truth is, there have been several cases where officers have been using out of date, mis-calibrated, or malfunctioning devices to administer DUI tests. These test results can likely be incorrect as the machines have been compromised. The problem is that you will be unable to make this determination on your own accord and will rather need the services of a DUI lawyer to bring up the evidence in court.

Even in the event that you are positive you were not drunk, you do not have the resources to test the devices used. Unfortunately, you also will be unable to prove whether or not the arresting officer was incorrect. Fortunately, a skilled DUI lawyer can help save you thousands of dollars, community service time, and your reputation.

Latin Kings Leader Pleads Guilty To Racketeering Conspiracy

Criminal Defense No Responses »

Nov 212010

Greenbelt, Maryland — Remy Heath, a/k/a Remy, King Remy, and King Mellow, age 26, of Hyattsville, Maryland pleaded guilty today to conspiracy to participate in a racketeering enterprise, in connection with his gang activities as a member and leader of the Almighty Latin King and Queen Nation (Latin Kings).

If you or a loved one has been charged with racketeering, contact our Indianapolis Conspiracy lawyer now!

The guilty plea was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein; Assistant Attorney General Lanny A Breuer, of the Department of Justice Criminal Division; Special Agent in Charge Theresa R. Stoop of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives – Baltimore Field Division; Chief J. Thomas Manger of the Montgomery County Police Department; Montgomery County State’s Attorney John McCarthy; Chief Roberto L. Hylton of the Prince George’s County Police Department; and Prince George’s County State’s Attorney Glenn Ivey.

According to Heath’s plea agreement, the Latin Kings is a violent street gang with thousands of members across the country and overseas. The Latin Kings have a detailed and uniform organizational structure, which is outlined – along with various prayers, codes of behavior and rituals – in a written manifesto widely distributed to members throughout the country. Members of the Latin Kings are also traditionally given King Names or Queen Names, which are names other than their legal names, by which they are known to members of the gang and to others on the street. At the local level, groups of Latin Kings are organized into tribes, including, the Royal Lion Tribe, MOG, Sun Tribe and UTL.

Heath was an original member of the Royal Lion Tribe in Maryland, which later became MOG, which later became the Sun Tribe. Heath joined the Royal Lion Tribe of the Latin Kings in early summer of 2007. Heath attended Latin King meetings where dues were collected from members and gang business was discussed, and he communicated with Latin King members and associates by phone and through the internet. Heath traveled from Maryland to New York for Latin King activities and participated in missions for the gang. From November 2008 to March 2009, Heath held a leadership position in the gang, serving as the Second Crown or Cacique for the MOG tribe.

Heath faces a maximum sentence of life in prison. U.S. District Judge Alexander Williams, Jr. has scheduled sentencing for May 27, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. Heath remains detained. Six co-defendants previously pleaded guilty to the racketeering conspiracy.

Mr. Rosenstein and Mr. Breuer thanked the ATF-led RAGE Task Force, including the Gaithersburg Police Department; the Montgomery County Police Department; Montgomery County State’s Attorney’s Office; Prince George’s County Police Department; Prince George’s County State’s Attorney’s Office; the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, the Maryland National Capital Park Police – Prince George’s County Division; and the Maryland State Police; as well as, the New York Police Department; the U.S. Secret Service, and the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation, for their assistance in this investigation and prosecution.

United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein commended Assistant United States Attorneys Emily Glatfelter and David Salem, and Lara M. Peirce, a Trial Attorney with the Criminal Division’s Gang Unit, who are prosecuting the case.

Important Priorities to Consider when Hiring a Criminal Attorney

Criminal Defense No Responses »

Nov 202010

If you are faced with serious criminal charges, you only have a few options. You can choose to go it alone, you can opt for a public defender, or you can consult a criminal attorney to represent you in court. Shortly, we will cover which is the best option for you. Frankly, only consulting a criminal attorney may give you the highest probability of having your charges dismissed, or achieving a reduced charge. When you are arrested, you will be read at your rights. A San Diego DUI lawyer advised is highly recommended that you pay particular attention to the right to remain silent, and ask immediately to consult your lawyer.

When it comes to court cases, time is a crucial factor. It is important you find a criminal attorney to represent you quickly. Try searching your local online listings or thumbing through the Yellow Pages to find one in your area. Be aware that there are a few different methods of finding a good criminal attorney.

It is always smart to check for attorney referrals from your friends and family. If you find no luck there, start calling around to the local criminal attorneys to ask about their track record and measure their level of professionalism. You will most likely be able to make a good decision by the feeling you get after speaking with several attorneys on the telephone.

Most people believe that consulting a criminal attorney can be very costly. Don’t even let this thought cross your mind. If you end up being convicted of your charges, you will most likely lose far more money then an attorney would charge. The small cost that your attorney charges could save you from large fines, legal penalties, and even prison time.

When facing really serious criminal charges it is important you pay for the most experienced and knowledgeable attorney you can afford. The better your attorney, the more likely you are to avoid extremely high finds and severe penalties.

Again, there are three main reasons for hiring a criminal attorney. The first reason is that the criminal attorney is going to be on your side. When you’re facing charges, you often feel very alone. All the law terms and procedures can leave you feel confused and overwhelmed. Your criminal attorney will be with you every step of the way. He or she will explain what’s going on, will tell you how to act, dress, what to say and when to say it. Basically, they are your advocate when you previously had no one.

A San Diego DUI attorney added, another important reason to consult a criminal attorney is because his or her reputation is riding on the outcome of your case. Meaning, if they lose they will often times be overlooked by future potential clients because they carry a poor record. On the flip-side, if they win they will gain many future clients and therefore have many incentives. Your criminal attorney has many reasons to do their best in winning your case.

Lastly, you should consult a criminal attorney that is highly experienced because they will understand pertinent information about the law and know where to find the loopholes. An experienced criminal attorney will know how to get evidence against you thrown out of court, convince the jury that you are in fact innocent, or even have your entire case dismissed based on a technicality. After all, in most cases that would be the best possible outcome and is really the reason why you hired them to represent you.

Indiana Family Law

Family Law No Responses »

Nov 172010

Marital status in most states refers to the lawful recognition of the agreement between a man and a woman to be husband and wife. Along with the legal marital status of being married, the husband and wife acquire rights and obligations to their respective spouses. The rights and obligations normally begin when the couple is married and may continue, to a certain extent, even after the termination of the marriage. Our Indiana family lawyers can help you further define marital status and how it can effect you.

Our family law attorneys are dedicated to providing the best possible service to their clients. If you or a loved one face complex litigation in a family matter, or if you are an attorney seeking to make a client referral, we welcome your contact at the law firm of Pennamped and Associates. Our exclusive family law focus and experience makes us well equipped to respond effectively to your questions and concerns.

Divorce work is not the only thing Indiana family law lawyers can help with. Today, some people draft pre marital agreements, which spell out what the spouse gets in case of death or divorce. Our Indiana family law attorneys can help you write a pre marital agreement to protect your assets in case of divorce, or one that can provide for loved ones in case of death.

Our Indiana family law lawyers can help with:
• Divorce
• Separation
• Child support
• Child Custody
• Family court
• Pre marital agreements

While we actively participate in a variety of methods of effective dispute resolution such as mediation and arbitration, our family law lawyers can be determined litigators, experienced in assisting individuals and families with complex issues such as business valuations, division of stocks and retirements accounts, custody evaluations, and parental relocations.

Litigation Support – Infocache Corporation is a New York City-based company, provides high-quality litigation support services to the clients.

Jasper Man Sentenced for Computer Intrusion

Criminal Defense No Responses »

Nov 122010

INDIANAPOLIS—Scott R. Burgess, 46, of Jasper, Ind., was sentenced on September 17 to three years of probation by U.S. District Chief Judge Richard L. Young following his guilty plea to computer intrusion. This case was the result of a lengthy investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

If you or loved one has been charged with a computer crime, contact our Indiana computer crime lawyer now!

Burgess admitted that he accessed the Stens Corporation computer systems, based in Jasper, Ind., from various places on numerous occasions without authorization. Burgess further admitted that the computer intrusions were performed for the purpose of gaining commercial advantage and personal financial benefit. Burgess was employed by a competitor of Stens when he accessed the Stens’ computer systems.

According to Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd S. Shellenbarger, who prosecuted the case for the government, Chief Judge Young also ordered Burgess to serve the first six months of his probation term in a work release center. Burgess was also ordered to make restitution in the amount of $72,481.

Bodyguard Training

Legal Information No Responses »

Nov 082010

Our Bodyguard Training is unlike most bodyguard training schools. We focus on each student individually as our instructor to student ratio is much smaller than many of our competitors. By limiting our Bodyguard Training class size to no more than 12 students per course, we can offer individualized instruction in an intimate student to instructor ratio. We prepare and train in real world situations and not just a closed controlled environment where you cannot factor in real world scenarios. Our instructor team is comprised of former secret service agents.

Former Merrillville FBI Technician Indicted for Allegedly Embezzling More Than $30,000 in Evidence

Criminal Defense No Responses »

Nov 062010

HAMMOND, IN—A former employee at the FBI office in Merrillville was indicted yesterday on federal charges for allegedly embezzling more than $30,000 in evidence that she kept for herself instead of properly returning various amounts of cash as she claimed to have done. The defendant, Melissa L. Sims, who worked as an evidence control technician for the FBI in Merrillville from 1998 to September 2008, was indicted yesterday by a federal grand jury in Hammond on three counts of embezzlement and one count each of making false statements and witness tampering, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, announced today.

If you or a loved one has been charged with embezzling, contact our Indiana embezzling lawyers now!

Sims, 36,of Lowell, Ind., is scheduled to be arraigned at 1:30 p.m. on Sept. 30 before Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry in U.S. District Court in Hammond. The case was investigated by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago is handling the prosecution in the Northern District of Indiana.

According to the indictment, between 2005 and August 2008, Sims embezzled more than $30,000 in evidence that she was responsible for disposing of in accord with FBI rules and procedures. She allegedly made no effort to contact certain individuals to whom the various amounts of cash were properly to have been returned, choosing instead to keep the evidence for herself. The indictment alleges 10 different dates on which Sims signed 16 separate forms stating that various amounts of cash evidence, ranging from $2 to $2,790, had been “released” or “returned,” when she had actually taken the money for herself.

The indictment further alleges that in May 2010 Sims tampered with a witness by attempting to persuade the witness to provide false information to a federal law enforcement officer relating to financial transactions between Sims and the witness. At the time, investigators were probing the source of more than $80,000 in cash deposits to Sims’ bank account between 2005 and 2008.

The government is being represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark E. Schneider.

The charges in the indictment carry the following maximum penalties on each count: making false statements—five years in prison and a $250,000 fine; embezzlement—10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine; and witness tampering—20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, and restitution is mandatory. If convicted, however, the Court would determine a reasonable sentence to impose under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

An indictment contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendant is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.